• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 16:21:26 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1025-1465503B6F7D11D7B61E0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• References: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F805C1F86F@R...> <r01050400-1025-1465503B6F7D11D7B61E0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:


> Or perhaps customers would be wiser to simply learn to process WordML
> and forget about the other features.  There's no risk of data loss
> there, at least based on the current (scant) information.

That would be fine if it were documented, but according to report it is not.

-- 
John Cowan  www.ccil.org/~cowan  www.reutershealth.com  jcowan@r...
All "isms" should be "wasms".   --Abbie

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RE: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • RE: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: The Zen of xml-dev
• Next by Date: Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
• Previous by thread: RE: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
• Next by thread: Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread