• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
• From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:36:41 -0700
• In-reply-to: <3EAF32A7.3010001@p...>
• References: <3EAF32A7.3010001@p...> <001f01c30ea8$a5bda670$6401a8c0@tbp1> <002801c30e1b$b513b7a0$6401a8c0@pcukmka> <200304292356.h3TNu1902985@d...> <oproe3pqfgezizxn@s...>

Paul Prescod wrote:
> Mike Champion wrote:
>  > ... d) W3C could
> > have "reinvented HTTP" to resolve URNs in a distributed, reliable manner
> > several times over with the effort that has gone into this debate.
> > </rant>
>
> I don't think the issue is invention. Invention is easy.


Agree completely.  In fact, I've invented an absolutely
reliable URN resolution scheme: don't bother trying to
resolve them.

This works perfectly for namespace names, RDF property names,
and all the other places that use URIs for names.

> Rolling it out is hard.

Yep.  There's always someone insisting that well, someday
you *might* want to resolve it, so you'd better stick with
HTTP, just in case.


--Joe English

  jenglish@f...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • RE: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds tohalt?)
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
• Next by Date: Re: off topic but maybe useful
• Previous by thread: Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML1.1 grinds to halt?)
• Next by thread: Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread