• To: 'XML Dev' <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:39:59 -0400
• References: <002801c30e1b$b513b7a0$6401a8c0@pcukmka>

[Michael Kay]

> Since the bottom line in the Namespaces spec is that parsers are
> supposed to accept any character string in the role of a namespace name,
> the obvious solution is to remove all the fine words about IRIs which
> don't actually affect conformance anyway.
>

If an IRI is supposed to be able to use any local encoding, how is the
network supposed to know which encoding is being used for any particular
IRI?

Cheers,

Tom P

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• References:
  • RE: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSLT Software Tool
• Next by Date: Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?
• Previous by thread: RE: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?
• Next by thread: Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread