• To: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Subject: Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:18:58 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200304300236.h3U2af903670@d...>
• References: <3EAF32A7.3010001@p...> <001f01c30ea8$a5bda670$6401a8c0@tbp1> <002801c30e1b$b513b7a0$6401a8c0@pcukmka> <200304292356.h3TNu1902985@d...> <oproe3pqfgezizxn@s...> <200304300236.h3U2af903670@d...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212

Joe English wrote:
> ...
>>Rolling it out is hard.
> 
> 
> Yep.  There's always someone insisting that well, someday
> you *might* want to resolve it, so you'd better stick with
> HTTP, just in case.

I wouldn't say that you might, someday want to put something resolvable 
at the end of your namespace URIs. I'd say that today you should put 
documentation at the end of your namespace URIs. It's just simple 
politeness. e.g.

http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/

  Paul Prescod

• References:
  • Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • RE: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds tohalt?)
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: (data) medium is the message
• Next by Date: RE: (data) medium is the message
• Previous by thread: Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
• Next by thread: Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds tohalt?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread