[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re:[xml-de

• To: <xml-dev@l...>,"Joe English" <jenglish@f...>
• Subject: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• From: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@a...>
• Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:42:02 -0700
• References: <E17v0lQ-0004LR-00@m...> <200209271952.g8RJqt316499@d...>

See the Apache Axis WSIF project paper
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/b/bth/OOWS2001/duftler.pdf
You can dynamically parse the WSDL file and access a web service dynamically
(with no generation of dynamic Java classes etc).  You can imagine a single
piece of code acting as the guts of a client that can access any web service
described by WSDL.  (It's not a reality yet, but there's a significant part
of it working.)  A client program can be directed to a WSDL file which is
very similar to the one published by the owner of the Web service in
question, but has changes.  This is actually useful in development when the
original wsdl file is broken, or uses constructs that the consuming software
cannot grok, and you can work around the difficulties, but clearly it can be
used maliciously as well.

Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe English" <jenglish@f...>
To: <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 12:52 PM
Subject: Re:  Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was
Re: TAG on HLink)
> I was under the impression that developers download
> WSDL documents from service providers, feed them to
> some kind of WSDL toolkit, point, click, drag, drop,
> and out pops a working application that can access
> the service; at that point the original Web Service
> Description document is no longer needed.
>
> Is that not the case?  Does the end user need the WSDL
> file at runtime as well?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (wasRe: TAG on HLink)
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: More namespaces fun!
• Next by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Previous by thread: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• Next by thread: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (wasRe: TAG on HLink)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread