RE: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
I don't need luck. Just Microsoft. The price is good, the maintenance is fair. But it is a lot easier to maintain then a system for which I must inspect all the source all the time. Once above one, all the interoperability problems start. If we want true simplicity, there is a way. :-) HTML works like that. It's the tradeoffs of choice. XML has fewer than SGML. That built a market. So sometimes choice is bad? len -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:veillard@r...] On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 09:36:50AM -0600, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > Of which I generally only need one... same as SGML. So everybody agreed on an SGML implementation ? Either choice is good or not, you cannot defend both. And as far as I understood there wasn't that many SGML processor (especially for a reasonable price) though people seems to have suffered long and hard that each processors had his own set of "features". So which one were you all using ;-) ? Of course choice is good and the fact that you may need only one is pointless ... well actually this open interesting questions like price and maintainance. Good luck in this respect with such a viewpoint.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format