Re: RE: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
3/18/2002 1:35:53 PM, "Stan" <StanD@s...> wrote: >How does one know when a given technology reaches the 80/20 point other >than by its success in the marketplace? Maybe the 80/20 point is a good >predictor of success, but the whole concept of 80/20 is too slippery for >me to grasp. Could someone tell me how does one design something to hit >the 80/20 point? Hmm, I feel a decision tree discussion coming on. Too bad I'm about to be incommunicado for the rest of the week ... I'm sure Len will flame my arguments to a crisp in my absence <grin> I'd say: - Occam's razor: choose the design with the fewer components, all things being equal - It's an attitude, not a specific design criterion "Dare to do less!" Tim Bray had a nice message on the TAG mailing list around the first of the year, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jan/0000.html But I think the Web and the W3C would both have been well-served if at a couple of points in recent years some voice could have spoken ex cathedra saying "This is too complicated. Go back and throw some of it away or find another way to fix the problem." - Take the "Extreme Programming" approach and do the simplest thing that could possibly work, then figure out what you learned from the experience, refactor, and do it again. Iterate until your "paying customers" are solving real problems with your technology better than they do with the alternatives. Sigh, the aluminum torture tube calls ... you folks won't have me clogging your inbaskets for a few days!
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format