• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
• Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:55:39 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE9F1@HQ5>; from clbullar@i... on Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 01:02:45PM -0600
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE9F1@HQ5>
• Reply-to: veillard@r...
• User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 01:02:45PM -0600, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> I don't need luck.  Just Microsoft.  The price is 
> good, the maintenance is fair.  But it is a lot 
> easier to maintain then a system for which I must 
> inspect all the source all the time.

  Right, you know it's bugged and you can't fix it,
nor get it fixed quickly if you need so.

  It's time I exit this thread.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@r...  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

• References:
  • RE: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Next by Date: Which Choices Matter? (WAS RE: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?")
• Previous by thread: RE: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Next by thread: RE: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread