[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RDDL Specification

• From: Naohiko Yamashita <nyamashita@z...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 15:31:31 +0900

Although I'm interested in RDDL Specifiction,

I think there are the following bugs in RDDL specification,

http://www.rddl.org/ .



1)Incorrect MIME type for XML DTD

There are several incorrect MIME type, text/xml-dtd used 

in the RDDL expression for RDDL specification itself,

i.e.

xlink:role="http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/media-types/text/xml-dtd"

However, the media type for DTD registered at IANA is application/xml-dtd rather than text/xml-dtd.



I found similar descriptions also in

- XSet : http://www.openhealth.org/XSet/ and

- Venetica VeniceBridge : http://venetica.com/venicebridgecontent/  .



2)DTD fragment declaration for rddl:resource in section 4.

I think xlink:embed should be replaced to xlink:show .



N.Yamashita / Air Liquide Japan


-----
$B;32<(J $BD>I'(J <nyamashita@z...>
$B$3$N%a!<%k$O(JZDNetMail( http://www.zdnetmail.ne.jp )$B$+$iAw?.$5$l$^$7$?!#(J

• Prev by Date: Re: PCDATA and CDATA
• Next by Date: Pakistan has an English-language weblog
• Previous by thread: Disappointing test results with First Release of the W3C XMLSche ma Test Collection
• Next by thread: Pakistan has an English-language weblog
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread