[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)

• From: Joel Rees <rees@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 14:56:44 +0900

Elliotte Rusty Harold expounded:

> Blueberry would change the definition of the XML language, not
> just the specification. While  every document that is a well-
> formed XML 1.0 document will still be a well-formed Blueberry
> document, many documents that are not  well-formed XML 1.0
> documents will be well-formed Blueberry documents. It would be
> a bad thing to try to sweep this change under the rug and
> pretend we always meant to do this.

The practical mathematician in me wonders why such a thing should require
pretense. <observation>While it is true that good design often wears
well</observation>, <axiom>no artifact of mortal beings can hope to undure
long unchanged</axiom>.

Joel Rees
programmer -- rees@m...
----------------------------------------------------
To be a tree supporting all information,
  giving root to the chaos
    and branches to the trivia,
      information breathing anew --
        This is the aim of Yggdrasill.
============================XML as Best Solution===
Media Fusion Co. ,Ltd.  $B3t<02q










Prev by Date:
Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)

Next by Date:
Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)

Previous by thread:
Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)

Next by thread:
Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)

Index(es):

Date
Thread