|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: simple question on namespaces.
At 09:41 PM 28/12/00 -0500, Arjun Ray wrote: >On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Tim Bray wrote: > >> I think a helpful question is "What can you do with little chunks >> of XML when they *don't* have names unique across the Net?" The >> answer is "Not much." > >What can you do with little chunks of XML when they don't have >meaning *shared* across the Net? Not much, again. OK. But there are lots of ways to share meaning, starting from emailing executables or source code around, ranging to universal machine-processable semantic definitions in some future world, but none of them work unless you can name things. >> Hence, namespaces, and if all they ever did was provide names, >> that'd be fine. > >Only to those who already know what those names mean. Granted. >In a public >environment like the Net, where the point is to agree on and share >definitions, a "controlled vocabulary" without a means to verify >formal validity is magnificently useless. Now that's just silly. There is no machine-processable definition of the semantics of HTML or SVG or PostScript or PDF or JPG or GIF or - you name it - but knowledge of how to deal with these data formats is self-evidently shared; hence the requirement for MIME technology to identify them. A similar need exists for chunks of XML, well in advance of us having technology to share definitions beyond the syntactic level. -Tim
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








