|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Remember to RELAX (was RE: Are there still a lot of people usingDTD)
At 04:11 PM 8/1/00 -0400, Bob Kline wrote: >I've assumed (from a distance) based on statements that use phrases like >"upward compatibility" and "easy transition" that the functionality >provided by RELAX was a subset of that provided by XML Schema. However, >I haven't found anything in the latter comparable to the attribute- >sensitive content models supported by RELAX. Is this because XML Schema >doesn't have such a feature, or just because it's harder to find things >in the more densely-worded Schema documentation (or perhaps just because >I'm not reading carefully enough)? I think there may be a fundamental mismatch between the models used by the two systems. XML Schemas seems to take a top-down typing and inheritance approach, whie RELAX uses a bottom-up approach with what feels to me like set theory. (They did announce the addition of a top-down model as well recently.) You might be able to do attribute-sensitive content models using some of the Schematron-like functionality that's found its way into recent drafts of XML Schemas (look for tools using XPath), but I'm not sure it's possible and hesitate to start digging. For me, RELAX descriptions read more naturally, but it seems to be the other way around for the object-oriented developers I always seem to end up presenting to. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








