• From: Jonathan Robie <Jonathan.Robie@S...>
• To: Bob Kline <bkline@r...>, Jonathan Robie <Jonathan.Robie@S...>
• Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2000 07:58:14 -0500

At 04:28 PM 7/3/00 -0400, Bob Kline wrote:
>On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Jonathan Robie wrote:
>
> > There is very little difference between XQL'98 and the abbreviated
> > syntax of XPath. XQL '98 may best be regarded as a predecessor of
> > XPath.
> >
> > Most of the kinds of queries people tend to do with SQL may be done
> > on a native XML representation using a query language called Quilt
> > (http://almaden.ibm.com/cs/people/chamberlin/quilt.html), which uses
> > the abbreviated syntax of XPath, but also provides tree construction
> > and joins.  This seems more natural than mixing XQL and XPath - it
> > uses one XML model for the data, instead of combining a relational
> > model with an XML model.
>
>Could you check the URL?  That host isn't showing up in DNS (I tried
>several DNS servers).

Sorry, the correct URL is:

http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/people/chamberlin/quilt.html

Jonathan


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: xpath vs xql
    • From: Jonathan Robie <Jonathan.Robie@S...>
  • RE: xpath vs xql
    • From: Bob Kline <bkline@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Newbie: XML to ascii
• Next by Date: Aelfred and non-validation
• Previous by thread: RE: xpath vs xql
• Next by thread: RE: xpath vs xql
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread