• From: Bob Kline <bkline@r...>
• To: Jonathan Robie <Jonathan.Robie@S...>
• Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 16:28:20 -0400 (EDT)

On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Jonathan Robie wrote:

> There is very little difference between XQL'98 and the abbreviated
> syntax of XPath. XQL '98 may best be regarded as a predecessor of
> XPath.
> 
> Most of the kinds of queries people tend to do with SQL may be done
> on a native XML representation using a query language called Quilt
> (http://almaden.ibm.com/cs/people/chamberlin/quilt.html), which uses
> the abbreviated syntax of XPath, but also provides tree construction
> and joins.  This seems more natural than mixing XQL and XPath - it
> uses one XML model for the data, instead of combining a relational
> model with an XML model.

Could you check the URL?  That host isn't showing up in DNS (I tried
several DNS servers).

-- 
Bob Kline
mailto:bkline@r...
http://www.rksystems.com


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: xpath vs xql
    • From: Jonathan Robie <Jonathan.Robie@S...>

• References:
  • RE: xpath vs xql
    • From: Jonathan Robie <Jonathan.Robie@S...>

• Prev by Date: RE: xpath vs xql
• Next by Date: RE: xpath vs xql
• Previous by thread: RE: xpath vs xql
• Next by thread: RE: xpath vs xql
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread