• From: Jonathan Robie <Jonathan.Robie@S...>
• To: Richard Lanyon <rgl@d...>, xml-dev@x...
• Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 12:03:52 -0500

There is very little difference between XQL'98 and the abbreviated syntax 
of XPath. XQL '98 may best be regarded as a predecessor of XPath.

Most of the kinds of queries people tend to do with SQL may be done on a 
native XML representation using a query language called Quilt 
(http://almaden.ibm.com/cs/people/chamberlin/quilt.html), which uses the 
abbreviated syntax of XPath, but also provides tree construction and joins. 
This seems more natural than mixing XQL and XPath - it uses one XML model 
for the data, instead of combining a relational model with an XML model.

Jonathan
--
Jonathan Robie
R&D Fellow, Software AG
Jonathan.Robie@SoftwareAG-USA


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: xpath vs xql
    • From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@y...>
  • RE: xpath vs xql
    • From: Bob Kline <bkline@r...>

• References:
  • RE: xpath vs xql
    • From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@m...>
  • RE: xpath vs xql
    • From: Richard Lanyon <rgl@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPERT is now available
• Next by Date: RE: xpath vs xql
• Previous by thread: RE: xpath vs xql
• Next by thread: RE: xpath vs xql
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread