[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Why do we write standards?

  • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • To: xml-dev <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 13:00:25 -0600

Re: Why do we write standards?
I so thorougly agree with your post on the costs and benefits of
standards that I cannot see why we disagree on the fundamental point.
It's worth trying again.

> Since we know so little about mixing HTML into other vocabularies
> right now, 

That's arguable, considering the number of HTMLish languages exist, but
let's pretend I agree.

> and since we know almost nothing about how XML will be used
> in Web clients, I think that it makes sense to start by standardizing
> only a little bit.  

I am all for incremental standardization!

> Let's give people a standard Namespace (and the
> name case) and then let them start experimenting 

This is the part I get lost. Namecase interoperability is not
interesting in the least. The only reason it would be interesting is if
we were trying to achieve other types of interoperability. Normalizing
TABLE and Table to the same spelling is only useful if they really ARE
the same thing. If my <TABLE> can contain <TITLE> and <FOOBAR> and your
<Table> can contain <if> and <blink> then they are fundamentally
different and adopting the same namecase does not help.

This is even more the case for name*space* interoperability. We use the
same namespace to say that we are working interoperably. If we are not
(or may not be) working interoperably then why would we use the same
namespace?

It's not about socialism versus libertarinism. It's about adopting a
title like "Democratic Republic of Congo" when there is no democracy to
speak of. 

Namespace equivalent: "Product XYZ supports the XHTML namespace. We use
it in completely different ways than anyone else and our software
crashes with many documents that other people create using XHTML, but we
are XHTML namespace compatible!" What's the damn point?

-- 
 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for himself
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/txconst/sections/cn000100-000400.html

"No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any
office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be
excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments,
provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being."
                         - Texas Constitution, Article 1, Section 4

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)



PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.