[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation)

  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • To: xml-dev@i...
  • Date: Wed, 08 Sep 1999 17:20:02 -0400

Re: Layers
At 04:55 PM 9/8/99 -0400, David Megginson wrote:
>Does DDML handle Namespaces?  If so, then there's your spec.  There's
>no law that says you have to wait for the W3C to bless something, and
>DDML has the (good) characteristic of not breaking existing XML tools,
>a characteristic missing from any modification of DTD syntax.

Sure.  But does DDML have any implementations?  No.  Perhaps that's my own
fault, but it seems a lot easier to add a PI to DTDs, which doesn't break
anything, than to write a DDML implementation from scratch.

>There was no warning, however, that DTD syntax might change.

I think you're overestimating the syntax changes being described.  A PI
would be ignored by parsers that didn't understand it, and james anderson's
suggestion of interpreting attribute declarations makes even less impact.
(I don't think that one will necessarily work, however.)

>See above.  We talked about pre-release pragmatism during the XHTML
>discussion -- keep everything small, simple, and modular -- but we
>also have to consider post-release pragmatism -- don't screw around
>with released specs until you have a very good,
>world-is-about-to-blow-up reason.  This is more of a
>my-car-radio-is-stuck-on-AM reason.

Have you listened to AM radio in Central New York?  Never mind that question.

I don't think what I'm proposing is inconsistent with the values you are
espousing. If I felt it was going to take a drastic reconfiguration of DTD
syntax, with implications for all those corporations in search of
stability, I wouldn't be bothering.  Instead, it seems like I'm applying
the small, simple, and modular approach to a problem that has irritated a
lot of folks for a long time.  It's taking something useful from one
situation and applying it to another - reuse in a different context, with a
little added information.

And, as always, nothing I post has any official standing anyway, right?


Simon St.Laurent
XML: A Primer (2nd Ed - September)
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies
http://www.simonstl.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)



PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.