RE: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'
Tim, Thanks for your sincere reply. When I wrote the original message, I was beating the drum of frustration and did not expect you to answer directly. I applogize if you found my message too harsh; I tend to over do it sometimes (some would say all the time). Although I generally need two sampling to get a feel for the scale of quality in any particular area, I think the F2F I went to was average in quality and definitely not a horrible meeting to an average person. It was my first so I had higher expectation than most people in the meeting. I could tell that the Chair was working hard to make real progress and everyone was trying to get some work done. But, with my high expectation, inefficiency of it all loomed largely in my memory. While there is someone to take minutes, there is a great deal of work being lost between the lines of the minutes. There is only finite amount of time allocated for each topic so discussions are hurried and usually scratches only the surface. My point is that, no matter how hard one tries, such meetings are just not very efficient by its nature. IMHO, F2F meetings should be used only to resolve serious conflicts and to edit the spec. Telephone meetings should likewise be used only to resolve minor conflicts and to have straw polls. Since serious conflicts are political in nature and not of technical nature, I have nothing against having those minutes remain confidential. With confidential matters isolated to F2F and telephone meetings, there should be no reason to keep the technical discussions confidential. Technical discussions should take place fully in public using a web-based project management tool that keeps track of issues, tasks, schedule, people, and resources visually over the web and allows threaded searchable discussions. Such tools are starting to appear now in the market so it is just a matter of deciding to use it. While I have other complaints, I believe above changes I suggested can go a long way in improving the W3C. If I had to sum it all up, it is this: 1. Increase public participation by separating political and technical discussions. 2. Don't just create standards, put them into practice to solve its own problems. Best, Don Park - mailto:donpark@d... Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format