[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

weak validation

• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: "XML-Dev Mailing list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 11:55:33 -0400

At 11:38 AM 8/30/99 -0400, Ann Navarro wrote (Re: why distinctions within
XHTML?):
>At 11:18 AM 8/30/99 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>>Maybe it's time to reexamine the valid/not-valid distinction we get out of
>>the XML 1.0 spec and start looking at more sophisticated 'weak validation'
>>like Rick Jelliffe's discussed.
>
>'weak validation' or 'weak conformance' has been discussed at length, and
>found to be a very, very bad idea. 

I find answers like this hazardous.  'has been discussed at length' by who?
 The usual band of folks who who have used SGML for the decade or more?  Or
by developers looking for a way to use schemas without binding themselves
into a straitjacket?

Probably the best thing I got out of the Montreal XML Developer Days
conference this year was that binding ourselves into straitjackets isn't
always the right idea, even if tradition and perhaps intuition suggest
otherwise.

Simon St.Laurent
XML: A Primer (2nd Ed - September)
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies
http://www.simonstl.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: weak validation
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• References:
  • Re: why distinctions within XHTML?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: why distinctions within XHTML?
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • why distinctions within XHTML?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: NAMESPACES: expressing commonality or distinction
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • NAMESPACES: expressing commonality or distinction
    • From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
  • Re: why distinctions within XHTML?
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Next by Date: Re: weak validation
• Previous by thread: Re: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Next by thread: Re: weak validation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread