[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Lotsa laughs

  • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
  • To: "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 11:48:35 -0400

RE: Lotsa laughs
Hi Chris,

Thanks for giving more info about W3C composition. You stated that w3c makes
specs and this is right but a lot of people treats this as "standard".

You also said that some of these specs are brought to ISO for
standardization. Good, more of them should follow the same path ;-)

It seems that we need more and more a good map of different "standard"
institutions and be careful of where we put the tag "standard" and what's
behind this word.

you said:
> I don't think it is fair to say that no Americans can help produce
> internationalised specifications. People like Francois Yergeau, Glenn
> Adams and Gavin Nicol (three of the four authors of RFC2070,
> "Internationalization of the HyperText Markup Language") are all based
> in the Americas (USA and Canada). [The fourth author was Martin Durst,
> who is Swiss and works for W3C, out of the Japanese host institution.]

reply:
I understand your point but isn't RFC2070 under IETF?

Didier said:
> d) ISO is an international organism with representative from different
> countries. But ISO weight seems to be less and less significant.

Chris said:
> ISO represents governments, not the international community at large.
> For example. Tibetan is a language, but was not added into ISO 10646
> because Tibet is ruled by China. Only when the Unicode consortium became
> involved were the characters needed for non-governmental scripts added.
> (By way of an example).

> I don't think ISO is insignificant, but it does seem to work best when
> taking existing well implemented specifications and performing editorial
> clarifications rather than de-novo technical work.

reply:
Thank for the precision. You are very right on this. ISO represent
governments not necessarily communities or conquered countries. I also agree
on ISO Speed of action (very slow). We also tend to forget ( the public)
what ISO is and what the word "standard" means, or what behind a word like
"standard" :-)

So, with this perpective should we say that instead of talking of "standard"
for a lot of actual technologies we should instead talk of "proposal" or
"recommendations"?

Thanks Chris for bringing more info on what's behind W3C.

regards
Didier PH Martin
mailto:martind@n...
http://www.netfolder.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)



PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.