Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: W
Bill la Forge wrote: > > The advantage of SAX is its independence from DOM, > as that allows for the development of SAX components > (filters) which can be used for > 1. Preprocessing events before they are used to build the DOM; > 2. DOM construction; > 3. Output formatting from a DOM or without a DOM; > 4. Simple document transformations. > > What I'm more inclined to do in this SAX/DOM marriage, > is to create an alternative to the SAX helper class, AttributeListImpl, > which also implements > public Attr setAttribute(Attr newAttr); > and > public Attr removeAttribute(String name); > and > public Attr getAttribute(String name); > This is a nice idea. Factor out the common, helper objects used by both the document-oriented DOM and the event-oriented SAX. This would be pretty. It would allow a marriage, but yet keep their independence (which is the key to any successful marriage). :) Clark xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format