[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)

• From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• To: "Paul Prescod" <paul@p...>, "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 12:55:35 -0500

Paul Prescod wrote:
>
> You didn't really answer my question. If Oracle 8i provides the same
> support for "graphs of data with links and annotations" that ObjectDesign
> then in what sense is it NOT an object database. I'm still asking for a
> definition.
>
	My point is that you can essentially store anything with any type of
database. Certainly you can store objects in a relational database, and you
can represent tables in an object database. This issue is one of performance
for a particular task.

	In general, object databases have been designed to efficiently store lots
of c++ (or java) objects which contain embedded pointers (or references) and
they provide a mechanism to navigate the database using the semantics of a
pointer dereference. They are not designed to *efficiently* perform complex
queries, especially those that SQL databases excell at.

	The question is, then, not that you *can* store objects in an object
database (because you clearly can store objects in a relational database),
nor whether you can query a database, because you can clearly query an
object database, rather what is the performance of a particular database for
a particular application.

	I think the term 'object database' has or may have become more of a
marketing term than a strict technical term. If you want to call Oracle an
object database because it stores objects, or processes directed graphs,
then so be it (though that would raise a few eyebrows :-). The real question
is: which database efficiently stores, indexes, queries and retrieves XML
(or more accurately DOM) datastructures.

Jonathan Borden
http://jabr.ne.mediaone.net


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)
    • From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Frontier as a scalable XML repository (was Re: Is XML dead already or what?)
• Next by Date: Repositories: From Argument to Architecture
• Previous by thread: Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)
• Next by thread: RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread