[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: What is XML for?

• From: "Frank Boumphrey" <Bckman@i...>
• To: "Paul Prescod" <paul@p...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:55:17 -0500

Paul Prescod wrote:

>>I've noticed a very unfortunate trend among my customers. They want to
replace relational databases with XML. They want to replace purpose-built
query languages with XSL.<<

What wouldn't I give for your customers.  My customers eyes start to glaze
over when I start talking about XML!!

Frank
Frank Boumphrey

Style and XML information http://www.hypermedic.com/style/index.htm
Author: Professional Style Sheets for HTML and XML http:// www.wrox.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
To: <xml-dev@i...>
Sent: Friday, January 29, 1999 12:50 PM
Subject: What is XML for?


>David Megginson wrote:
>>
>> Why would you be disappointed if you were following best practice?
>> This is *exactly* the right way to use XML, at least in the data
>> world.  XML is designed to be an exchange format that allows different
>> systems to talk to each other; it does not dictate how those systems
>> should deal with the information internally.
>
>I've noticed a very unfortunate trend among my customers. They want to
>replace relational databases with XML. They want to replace purpose-built
>query languages with XSL. They want to replace object models and UML with
>DTDs and "XML Schemas". People are also talking about using the DOM as the
>interface to data of all sorts. This trend is very worrisome and will
>likely lead to a backlash against XML.
>
>I'm working in the opposite direction. I wonder:
>
> * Isn't OQL pretty close to an XML query language?
>
> * Aren't STEP and ODL pretty close to being XML object model schema
>languages?
>
> * Wouldn't it be nice to have more formal mechanisms for characterizing
>languages (like XQL, XPointer, URLs, JavaScript) that do NOT use
>angle-bracket syntax?
>
>Another worrisome trend is that people creating the XML standards would
>rather invent rather than learn about things that already exist.
>"NI@theW3C" syndrome?
>
> Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
> http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco
>
>Don't you know that the smart bombs are so clever, they only kill
>bad people."
> - http://www.boingo.com/lyrics/WarAgain.html
>
>xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
>Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
>To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
>(un)subscribe xml-dev
>To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following
message;
>subscribe xml-dev-digest
>List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
>
>


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: What is XML for?
• Next by Date: Re: What is XML for?
• Previous by thread: Re: What is XML for?
• Next by thread: Re: What is XML for?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread