[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Why informal specs usually win

• From: <david@m...>
• To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 08:35:55 -0500 (EST)

Paul Prescod writes:

 > That is not true. There were many bugs found in XML months after it
 > was available on a public mailing list. Characterizing bugs in
 > specifications is much, much harder than characterizing them in
 > code. It wouldn't be so hard if the specs were more formal, but
 > that isn't the way things are going.

Informal specs fit into the Worse-is-Better pattern [1]: a less formal
spec that many people can understand easily will generally be adopted
and implemented much more successfully than a more formal spec that
fewer people can understand, despite the disadvantage that the less
formal spec probably contains ambiguities, inconsistencies and
omissions.

Paul and I are among the five or six (I exaggerate -- 10 or 20) people
who ever bothered to figure out SGML groves, from one of the more
obfuscated formal specs, so we're not a good sample.


All the best,


David


[1] http://www.naggum.no/worse-is-better.html

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why informal specs usually win
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • RE: OSS vs W3C? was: Next Round
    • From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
  • Re: OSS vs W3C? was: Next Round
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Inheritance using DTDs
• Next by Date: Re: SAX: Next Round
• Previous by thread: Re: OSS vs W3C? was: Next Round
• Next by thread: Re: Why informal specs usually win
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread