[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: various issues

• From: David Megginson <dmeggins@u...>
• To: Peter@u...
• Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 09:10:51 -0400

Peter Murray-Rust writes:

 > What follows is the meta-DTD, right?  And the system knows it's
 > a meta-DTD because of the inclusion of one or more <?ArcBase PIs?

No, it's a derived DTD (actually, a DTD for a document that implements
a derived architecture).  A meta-DTD will not usually have an
<?ArcBase ..?> PI, unless it is mapped to yet another meta-DTD.

If you write a DTD, and include

  <?ArcBase html?>

in that DTD, you are suggesting that your DTD uses HTML as a base
architecture.  The HTML DTD is the meta-DTD, and it is not modified in
any way.

 > What this is doing is mapping elements in different DTDs to the
 > same element in your meta-DTD.  This implies that they are synonyms
 > in some way.  Does it assume that they have the same content model,
 > attributes and that the elements in the content model have
 > (recursively) been mapped onto the DTD.  Or are you essentially
 > aliasing SYM in HTML to SYMBOL and SYMBOL in MATH to SYMBOL but
 > having to provide different content models and processing for each?

No, it's the other way around -- the DTD for the derived architecture
maps some of its elements to those in one or more meta-DTDs (though
you don't have to do the mapping in the DTD itself).  If you're
creating document type X, and you're including architectures from
CALS, HTML, and TEI-L, then you put the mappings in the X DTD.

They don't have to have exactly the same content models -- the content
model in the derived DTD can be more restrictive (but not less).

 > This means your DTD is a superset of the other DTDs and your own elements?

Not exactly -- it means that there is an intersection between the
semantics of your DTD and the semantics of each of the meta-DTD.  Your
DTD may have element types that are not in the meta-DTD, and the
meta-DTD may have element types that are not in your DTD.

 > I think I start to understand.  By 'structure' you mean the tree structure
 > of each DTD?  In which case AFs are a way of providing multiple views of the
 > same document?

I don't follow.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 ak117@f...
Microstar Software Ltd.         dmeggins@m...
University of Ottawa            dmeggins@u...
        http://www.uottawa.ca/~dmeggins

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: various issues
• Next by Date: endless loops ?
• Previous by thread: Re: various issues
• Next by thread: Re: various issues
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread