XML Editor
Sign up for a WebBoard account Sign Up Keyword Search Search More Options... Options
Chat Rooms Chat Help Help News News Log in to WebBoard Log in Not Logged in
Conferences Close Tree View
+ Stylus Studio Feature Requests (1192)
- Stylus Studio Technical Forum (14621)
-> - Stylus Studio - Registrar en o... (1)
-> + Stylus Studio - Registrar en o... (2)
-> + Can a pipeline send a file by ... (2)
-> + After Updateing WIN10 to WIN11... (12)
-> + Where do I add the custom java... (3)
-> + Where is the Diagram tab? (5)
-> + Applying XSLT to Word DOCX/XML (2)
-> - CSV conversion via ConvertToXM... (1)
-> + Text symbols in SS not same as... (4)
-> + Exposing xquery as webservice ... (6)
-> + Syntax Identifier (2)
-> + Saving a Converted XML as an X... (5)
-> + Output document cannot be pars... (4)
-> - Archiving output from conversi... (1)
-> + EDIFACT guideline from Stylus ... (3)
-> + CSV file putting all the data ... (5)
-> + Can't install Home version 64b... (5)
-> + presale - Can I covers this sc... (5)
-> + Problem with UNB (5)
-> + Splitting EDIFACT files pipeli... (4)
-- [1-20] [21-40] [41-60] Next
+ Website Feedback (249)
+ XSLT Help and Discussion (7625)
+ XQuery Help and Discussion (2017)
+ Stylus Studio FAQs (159)
+ Stylus Studio Code Samples & Utilities (364)
+ Stylus Studio Announcements (113)
Topic  
Postnext
(Deleted User) Subject: What does this Error mean please
Author: (Deleted User)
Date: 18 Jun 2002 12:05 PM
Recurse: There is not a complete functional mapping between the particles

I get it when I do a restriction of a type and then do not use any of the elements but add new ones.

I am doing this as I want to do a substitution of an entirely new type without using the xsi:type mechanism.

Postnext
(Deleted User) Subject: Re: What does this Error mean please
Author: (Deleted User)
Date: 18 Jun 2002 01:54 PM
At 12.18 18/06/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>From: "Martin Roberts"
>
>Recurse: There is not a complete functional mapping between the particles
>
>I get it when I do a restriction of a type and then do not use any of the
>elements but add new ones.

If I understand what you are doing, it's not a legal schema. From the specs:

2.2.1.1 Type Definition Hierarchy
....
[Definition:] A type definition whose declarations or facets are in a
one-to-one relation with those of another specified type definition, with
each in turn restricting the possibilities of the one it corresponds to, is
said to be a restriction. The specific restrictions might include narrowed
ranges or reduced alternatives.

In plain English, a restriction can only repeat the elements or structures
of the base type and change its allowed values (or make an attribute
prohibited).
The "Schema Component Constraint: Particle Valid (Restriction)" paragraph
at 3.9.6 lists how this mapping should be done: if this table seems to
validate the restriction you are defining, please provide us (or the
Xerces-C++ team directly) with a testcase.

>I am doing this as I want to do a substitution of an entirely new type
>without using the xsi:type mechanism.

Have you tried using a substitution group?

Alberto

Postnext
(Deleted User) Subject: Re: What does this Error mean please
Author: (Deleted User)
Date: 19 Jun 2002 04:13 AM
The problem is if the substitution group head element is not empty and you do not want the heads structure you are not able to do what I want.

i.e
type x with element y as content
type z with element a as content

type x is defined by library outside of my control

If I declare element b of type x and element c of type z substitutiongroup b, I can not get it to work.

Posttop
(Deleted User) Subject: Re: What does this Error mean please
Author: (Deleted User)
Date: 19 Jun 2002 11:32 AM
At 04.26 19/06/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>From: "Martin Roberts"
>
>The problem is if the substitution group head element is not empty and you
>do not want the heads structure you are not able to do what I want.
>
>i.e
> type x with element y as content
> type z with element a as content
>
> type x is defined by library outside of my control
>
> If I declare element b of type x and element c of type z
> substitutiongroup b, I can not get it to work.

Yes, you are right; it looks that everything that deals with inheritance in
the XMLSchema specs (derivation by restriction, substitutionGroup,
xsi:type, redefine) doesn't allow what you have in mind. They are defined
to build an inheritance tree, where every instance of a derived type is a
valid instance of the base type: so you cannot remove pieces of the base
class (after all, you couldn't do it in a object-oriented language too...)

Alberto

   
Download A Free Trial of Stylus Studio 6 XML Professional Edition Today! Powered by Stylus Studio, the world's leading XML IDE for XML, XSLT, XQuery, XML Schema, DTD, XPath, WSDL, XHTML, SQL/XML, and XML Mapping!  
go

Log In Options

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Stylus Scoop XML Newsletter:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2016 All Rights Reserved.