[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Experiences comparing performance of XSLT vs. "raw
On 11/30/05, Karr, David <david.karr@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > I know this is a completely open question, but what kind of experience > have people had comparing the runtime performance and throughput of XSLT > vs. "raw Java code"? To ask a stupid question, I'm not really sure what you mean by "raw Java code" here. Do you mean processing the xml file via other mechanims (raw text processing, SAX, DOM, etc) or are you just talking about "compiled" scripts vs uncompiled scripts? Bytecod issues? Don't forget after all that there are XSLT processors that aren't Java based. Would you compare xsltproc against ...something? Sorry, a bit tired today and my brain keeps trying to figure this out. Jon Gorman
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|