[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Experiences comparing performance of XSLT vs. "raw

Subject: Re: Experiences comparing performance of XSLT vs. "raw Java code"
From: Jon Gorman <jonathan.gorman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:46:07 -0600
xslt vs dom
On 11/30/05, Karr, David <david.karr@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I know this is a completely open question, but what kind of experience
> have people had comparing the runtime performance and throughput of XSLT
> vs. "raw Java code"?

To ask a stupid question, I'm not really sure what you mean by "raw
Java code" here.  Do you mean processing the xml file via other
mechanims (raw text processing, SAX, DOM, etc) or are you just talking
about "compiled" scripts vs uncompiled scripts?  Bytecod issues?

Don't forget after all that there are XSLT processors that aren't Java
based. Would you compare xsltproc against ...something?

Sorry, a bit tired today and my brain keeps trying to figure this out.

Jon Gorman

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.