[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Experiences comparing performance of XSLT vs. "raw Jav

Subject: Experiences comparing performance of XSLT vs. "raw Java code"
From: "Karr, David" <david.karr@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:56:35 -0800
xslt java performance
I know this is a completely open question, but what kind of experience
have people had comparing the runtime performance and throughput of XSLT
vs. "raw Java code"?  I would guess the only scope limitation I could
give for this would be using Xalan and JDK 1.4.2.  Is there any
reasonable data, either within these constraints, or outside of them?  I
personally feel that XSLT will perform perfectly fine against raw Java,
even ignoring other advantages, like maintenance issues with complex
transformation code in Java, but I seem to be hearing resistance from
some people who claim it's a "known fact" that XSLT is slower than pure
Java.  That may be true in trivial examples, but I think real
transformations will likely show that XSLT is just as fast, or faster.

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.