[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Experiences comparing performance of XSLT vs. "raw Jav
I know this is a completely open question, but what kind of experience have people had comparing the runtime performance and throughput of XSLT vs. "raw Java code"? I would guess the only scope limitation I could give for this would be using Xalan and JDK 1.4.2. Is there any reasonable data, either within these constraints, or outside of them? I personally feel that XSLT will perform perfectly fine against raw Java, even ignoring other advantages, like maintenance issues with complex transformation code in Java, but I seem to be hearing resistance from some people who claim it's a "known fact" that XSLT is slower than pure Java. That may be true in trivial examples, but I think real transformations will likely show that XSLT is just as fast, or faster.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|