[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: Re: Assignment no, dynamic scoping si (was: Re
Thanks for the lead, Evan.
Evan Lenz wrote: Although the XSL WG hasn't discussed this issue as such, there was a proposal[1] (on the ides of March) which asked for much the same thing that you want. I think. It's framed as "syntax sugar", but it's obviously more than that. Can you tell me how close this proposal is to what you're proposing (modulo syntax)? (See below.)
While Miloslav's proposal may arise from a very similar motivation as mine, it appears to still rely on explicit parameters and on an uninterrupted chain of explicit parameter passing. The idea with implicit parameters is that they are "passed through" intermediary calls that have no interest in these parameters. regards -Gunther
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|