[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Re: Re: Assignment no, dynamic scoping si (was: Re

Subject: RE: Re: Re: Assignment no, dynamic scoping si (was: Re: RE: Wishes for XSL revisions ...
From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 15:39:51 -0800
RE:  Re: Re: Assignment no
I may have misunderstood his proposal, however I'm tripped up by the
following example, in which there are no <xsl:param/> elements:

<xsl:template match="*" mode="xxx">
<xsl:apply-templates>
  <xsl:propagate-param/>
  <xsl:with-param name="c">XXXXXXXX</xsl:with-param>
</xsl:apply-templates>
</xsl:template>

Miloslav, are you listening? What did you mean anyway? :) Is it just syntax
sugar or did you want implicit parameters?

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2001JanMar/0132.html

Evan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Gunther
> Schadow
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:17 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  Re: Re: Assignment no, dynamic scoping si (was: Re:
> RE: Wishes for XSL revisions ...
>
>
> Thanks for the lead, Evan.
>
> Evan Lenz wrote:
> > Although the XSL WG hasn't discussed this issue as such, there was a
> > proposal[1] (on the ides of March) which asked for much the
> same thing that
> > you want. I think. It's framed as "syntax sugar", but it's
> obviously more
> > than that. Can you tell me how close this proposal is to what you're
> > proposing (modulo syntax)? (See below.)
>
> Miloslav's proposal appears to be different. I'm not sure
> I interpret it right, but it seems he basically wants the
> <propagate-params/> element as an abbreviation of the
> multiple <with-param ...> elements in the apply/call
> template(s) element.
>
> While Miloslav's proposal may arise from a very similar
> motivation as mine, it appears to still rely on explicit
> parameters and on an uninterrupted chain of explicit
> parameter passing. The idea with implicit parameters is
> that they are "passed through" intermediary calls that
> have no interest in these parameters.
>
> regards
> -Gunther
>
>
> --
> Gunther Schadow, M.D., Ph.D.                    gschadow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Medical Information Scientist      Regenstrief Institute for Health Care
> Adjunct Assistant Professor        Indiana University School of Medicine
> tel:1(317)630-7960                         http://aurora.regenstrief.org
>
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.