[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: xpath2 functions returning ()
David, > That wuld be a rather big change. If strings were sequences in that > sense then ("abc")[2] would be "b". Whereas currently it's raises an error, of course - nothing to do with the fact that strings aren't split into characters, but rather because predicates can only be used on steps, and general steps must return node sequences. So: (1, 2, 3)[2] is an error according to the XPath 2.0 WD, as far as I can tell. Which strikes me as rather peculiar, personally. Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|