Re: RE: Designs for XSLT functions

"Michael Kay" wrote:
>
> > > > I think clearly separating the specification of the abilities:
> > > >
> > > >   -> to statically define and statically
> > > >      invoke functions in XSLT, and
> > > >
> > > >   -> to dynamically invoke functions
>
> I don't see any need for special syntax to invoke functions whose name is
> decided at run-time. That can easily be done using a general-purpose
> evaluate() extension that constructs XPath expressions from strings.

An apply() function (which simply calls another function whose
name is decided at runtime) would be easier to use than a general-purpose
evaluate() routine though.  Programmatically constructing a syntactically
valid XPath expression can be tricky.

Apply() would likely also be easier to implement and more efficient
than evaluate().


--Joe English

  jenglish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list