[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: RE: syntax su
> Speaking of gnarly, I'm assuming xsl:call-template can be used within > exsl:function. If so, is it permissible for the exsl:result > to be in the called template, or so on down the chain? In Saxon, you can use call-template or apply-templates within a saxon:function, but it only makes sense within an xsl:variable that catches the result tree. You can't use saxon:return while instantiating an xsl:variable; so I decided the simplest rule was that the saxon:return must be structurally nested within saxon:function. > ("Every exsl:function must have an exsl:result within the > nodes in its descendant axis"). Saxon says "every saxon:return element must have an ancestor saxon:function element". It doesn't say the converse: if no saxon:return is instantiated, the result is an empty string. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|