RE: Call for Implementation: XSL 1.0 Becomes a W3C Candidate

sara.mitchell@xxxxxxxxx writes:
 > Well I got to it from the link? perhaps there's some other reason 
 > you can't get to it? because I'm certainly _not_ a member or 
 > an employee of a member...

my apologies to the W3C! it was a server down along the way. its just
that the message you get is pretty similar to the "haha you are not a
member of the Freemasons" message which comes from trying to see a
secret page.......


sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list