RE: Call for Implementation: XSL 1.0 Becomes a W3C Candidate

Well I got to it from the link? perhaps there's some other reason 
you can't get to it? because I'm certainly _not_ a member or 
an employee of a member...

Sara

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sebastian Rahtz
> [mailto:sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 11:42 AM
> To: fop-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Call for Implementation: XSL 1.0 Becomes a W3C Candidate
> Recommendation
> 
> 
> Max Froumentin writes:
>  > 2 Results of the Last Call 
>  > 
>  > The comment period for the Last Call Working Draft 
> produced a wide range
>  > of comments from the developer community and W3C working groups.
>  > 
>  > Disposition of Comments
>  > http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/XSL1/comments.html
>  > 
> 
> wouldn't it be nice if we could read this page? why is the W3C so
> obsessed with secrecy?
> 
> sebastian
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list