[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Saxon VS XT

Subject: Re: Saxon VS XT
From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:47:02 +0100 (BST)
Re: Saxon VS XT
Paul Tchistopolskii writes:
 > Not implementing key() is almost not a limitation. 
 > Most of developers will never ever use key() 
 > because they'll never ever understand how to use 
 > this function.

For good or bad, key() is well explained in several important
documentation sources, such as Kay's book, the CraneSoftwrights book,
and the FAQ. Possibly you'd like to visit the FAQ, find the answers
which mention key(), and explain how to do it using XT?

Developers will use what the documentation tells them to use. If all
the books have solutions to common problems based on key(), it will be
understood.

Sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.