[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Saxon VS XT

Subject: RE: Saxon VS XT
From: Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <TRA@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:16:11 +0200
RE: Saxon VS XT
> Not implementing key() is almost not a limitation. 
> Most of developers will never ever use key() 
> because they'll never ever understand how to use 
> this function. ( Same  is about document() with 
> 2 parameters ).

Eventually we will, when we have the concept described well enough -- especially since the speed improvement is so big.

Not using key, is like having to use Perl (or any other programming language) without being allowed to use hash tables for lookup purposes.

Use XT if it fits your purpose, but please do not use argumentation like the above since it puts all of us down.

-- 
  Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen   "...and...Tubular Bells!"





 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.