[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XSLT processor performance

Subject: Re: XSLT processor performance
From: Paul_Dick@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 13:20:06 -0400
Re: XSLT processor performance
Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
I should add that (to my surprise) Xalan does not recognize xsl:fallback,

The example given is using xsl:fallback outside of a template-body,  in a
top-level element.
According to the spec section 14.1
 When a namespace is designated as an extension namespace and an element
with a name from that
namespace occurs in a template, then the element is treated as an
instruction rather than as a literal result element.
NOTE: Since an element that is a child of an xsl:stylesheet element is not
occurring in a template, non-
XSLT top-level elements are not extension elements as defined here, and
nothing in this section applies to them.

Xalan does implement xsl:fallback,  however, in this incorrect usage, this
raises the question of, Should we
ignore it or alert the user of the bad stylesheet?  Currently we complain.

Paul


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.