RE: XSLT engine performance

Dylan Walsh writes:
 > It would be interesting to see Suns XSLT compiler (a.k.a "translets")
 > included. I have used it, and am impressed. It is easier to use and more
 > compliant than I had expected (it is still a "technology preview") and,
 > subjectively, seems very fast.

if anyone wants to try my silly test, its at
http://users.ox.ac.uk/~rahtz/xsltest2.zip (cem.xml and ex10.xsl). the
style sheet is trivial - it does a for-each select='top level
element' (about 2500 of them), and then an apply-templates which generates
some simplistic styling. The only interest is that it gives a
decent-sized tree for a processor to chew on, and run over.

Sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list