[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: CSS for transformation

Subject: Re: CSS for transformation
From: Tyler Baker <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1998 11:03:59 -0400
css baker
"Philippe Le Hégaret" wrote:

> Paul Prescod wrote:
> > I don't know that there is any real benefit in trading conspiracy
> > theories. After an initial scan, the XSL formatting model looks much more
> > complete than the CSS model. That doesn't mean that the CSS model is
> > wrong, or stupid or was a waste of time to create. It is simply not
> > sufficient. That's the nature of progress. Usually it isn't contentious to
> > say that older technologies need to be updated to solve new problems.
>   I don't think the XSL formatting model looks much more
> complete than the CSS model. If you look at the CSS specification
> and compare it to the XSL specification, you'll find differences
> but these differences can be removed in CSS3. It's not a really big
> problem. And if people wants an X, it's very easy to create the XCSS.
>   XSL wants to poorly transform XML documents into another
> XML document and it works (not well, but it works).
>   They define a new matching way, different than the CSS way.
>   XSL can't transform an XML document into an unknown format. I know, you
> could add a namespace and do a post-processor, but is it the good solution ?
> And, if it's not the goal of XSL, should we work on an another solution ?
>   XSL can't process an XML document very well because it's not
> a powerful language. They add xsl:if or xsl:for-each but who wants
> to write a program with the XML syntax ? They said, we'll add a script solution
> after because users can do stupid things with this, but for the moment,
> they don't propose an another solution for this. So we have to write programs
> to do the job.
>   So, I'm looking for an another solution, different than XSL. Any idea ?

Well there is speculation and there is fact.  The current XSL draft is working
quite well (at least for HTML output) for the needs of a highly-dynamic website I
am indirectly involved with.  I don't think XSL is supposed to be the end-all
solution for everything, but something simple enough that you don't need a
complicated programming background just to create a highly-dynamic website.

XSL as not a programming language.  It is not a scripting language either.  I feel
XSL's power will be in its simplicity and its ability to change the entire look and
feel of a website without changing the content or rewriting about 1000 lines of
JavaScript each time.  Writing code to present content is just not a very efficient
way of delivering dynamic content from a cost perspective.  No company in there
right mind wants to hire 10 JavaScript experts just to get a website going.

XSL I believe will succeed because it will eliminate the need for a lot of the
scripting solutions as well as the really high-end web-site server products people
use today to get the job done.  In the end, this saves businesses money and that is
why it will succeed.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.