|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re:
>>>>> "Colin" == Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Colin> Or are you requesting banning non-pure functions
Colin> altogether? This would mean disallowing calls to extension
Colin> functions, or else insisting extension functions must not
Colin> have side-effects. The latter condition would be
Colin> incompatible with XSLT 1.0, I think
Actually, it's far worse than that - functions such as last() are not
referentially transparent, so you can't have referential transparency.
Given that, would there be any advantage to having f($x) is f($x)
always returning true()?
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








