[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re:

Subject: Re: Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: Time for an exslt for 2.0?)
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 09:57:12 +0100
Re:  Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re:
> Or are you requesting banning non-pure functions altogether?
> This would mean disallowing calls to extension functions,

By extension function here you'd have to include banning functions that
can be defined within xslt (or xquery) not just vendor-extensions.

David

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.