RE: "Translate function"

Didier PH Martin writes:
 > You probably meant by the [1] (usually a footnote reference) that it is

Actually I meant "[1] using my test files, which may be odd".

 > faster than any of the other Java based XSLT implementations not necessarily
 > faster than the C++ based implementations.

there aren't any worthwhile C++-based implementations, are there? last
time I looked, the Oracle one was incomplete, and of course the
Microsoft one misses some key features.

Sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list