|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: "Translate function"
Hi David, David said: saxon is more complete, xt is usually faster, msxsl has better integration into a browser. It just depends whether you want a BMW or a Rover. Didier replies: I guess that you meant that XT is faster than the other java based implementations. Now you raised the point in my mind that it would be interesting to benchmark Transformiix and msxml to see how fast they are compared to the fastest java based implementation. cheers Didier PH Martin ---------------------------------------------- Email: martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Conferences: XML Europe (http://www.gca.org) Book: XML Professional (http://www.wrox.com) column: Style Matters (http://www.xml.com) Products: http://www.netfolder.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








