• From: Tony Graham <tgraham@a...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 17:27:10 +0100

Thanks, Rick, for the history and the update.  I'm glad -- we're all
glad -- that you can talk about recovery in the past tense.  Compared to
that, not recovering a hard disk is a minor issue.

On 19/05/2016 12:53, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
...

I think I worked pretty hard for the first decade of Schematron  from
1999 on Schematron, ...  more work than I could do in the second
decade.

The only problem with someone doing such major work is that other people
blithely assume that the work will continue at that pace indefinitely.
The same applies to blithely assuming continued availability of free
documentation and tools, I'm afraid.

I did move the code to google.com <http://google.com> but this needs
to get moved to gitlab.

Now that I've looked at it, I can see the advantages of GitLab, but
currently there's no Schematron-based projects or unofficial Schematron
copies on GitLab but multiple on GitHub:
https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=schematron.  However,
migrating from GitHub to GitLab seems largely automated [1].

...

Finally it is out: and a very big thanks to Murata-san and the WG
for taking over and seeing it through  when I could not. And a
bigger apology that I could not complete the last steps of the
Editor's job as committed.

Congratulations to all involved at any point.  There's no blame
anywhere, just a wonder why there wasn't news in January so we could
applaud it then.

Regards,


Tony Graham.
--
Senior Architect
XML Division
Antenna House, Inc.
----
Skerries, Ireland
tgraham@a...

[1]
http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/workflow/importing/import_projects_from_github.html

• References:
  • ISO/IEC 19757-3:2016 Schematron second edition?
    • From: Tony Graham <tgraham@a...>
  • Re: ISO/IEC 19757-3:2016 Schematron second edition?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>