Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 00:39:42 -0500 Gavin Thomas Nicol <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > I'd always had the impression (or guessed) that namespaces were > > partly there in order to bring into XML some of the power and > > obvious utility of architectural forms. As a matter of history, > > was that part of that particular zeitgeist? > > Architectural forms were presented as an alternative to namespaces > that provided similar expressiveness with less ugliness. The number of times I've heard praise for AF on this list, yet no one has ever proposed an updated version for XML. Did it have big holes? Was it SGML only? Any reason why it's not been reworked? -- regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format