[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web
- From: Uche Ogbuji <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Dave Pawson <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:50:15 -0700
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Dave Pawson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
The number of times I've heard praise for AF on this list, yet
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 00:39:42 -0500
Gavin Thomas Nicol <email@example.com
> > I'd always had the impression (or guessed) that namespaces were
> > partly there in order to bring into XML some of the power and
> > obvious utility of architectural forms. As a matter of history,
> > was that part of that particular zeitgeist?
> Architectural forms were presented as an alternative to namespaces
> that provided similar expressiveness with less ugliness.
no one has ever proposed an updated version for XML. Did it
have big holes? Was it SGML only? Any reason why it's not been
John Cowan and Jeni Tennison have both proposed and drafted updated AF versions for XML. And yes, both instances have been discussed primarily on this list.
Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net
Poetry ed @TNB: http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
| [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats,
enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.
Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website.
they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please