Re: XMLisms and HTML parsing and modes (was: Re: XML5)
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 19:23 -0500, Liam R E Quin wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 15:38 -0800, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > On Dec 16, 2010, at 14:13, Liam R E Quin wrote: > > > > > This <syntax /> came from SGML and was already legal in HTML from a > > > formal standards perspective. > > > > My understanding is that Annex K was added to SGML in late 1997 for > > the specific purpose of making XML 1.0 a subset of SGML. This was > > after HTML had been deployed. > > Yes. But the net syntax was already in SGML:1986. To clarify (thanks to David Carlisle for pointing this out), (1) HTML did enable NET tags (so Henri was mistaken in saying it didn't...) but... (2) HTML did not change the NET delimiter to "/>" but kept the default value of "/" (3) as a result, <br/ was legal HTML, as was <i/content here/, and was generally implemented by at least some of the SGML-based HTML tools and programs; (4) the xml variant, <br/>, is based on changing NET to "/>", and although any SGML document (and hence any HTML document before HTML 5) can change the SGML declaration to allow />, the default was <br/ and not <br/> (I'd forgotten that change, so I was mistaken too) Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format