Re: XMLisms and HTML parsing and modes (was: Re: XML5)
On Dec 16, 2010, at 14:13, Liam R E Quin wrote: > This <syntax /> came from SGML and was already legal in HTML from a > formal standards perspective. My understanding is that Annex K was added to SGML in late 1997 for the specific purpose of making XML 1.0 a subset of SGML. This was after HTML had been deployed. Also, I believe no IETF or W3C HTML spec that pretends HTML to be an application of SGML actually enables the NET-enabled start tags. Am I mistaken? -- Henri Sivonen email@example.com http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format