Re: Tradeoffs of XML encoding by enclosing all content in CDAT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I seem to be in the minority, but I think using CDATA-sections is entirely reasonable when inserting large amounts of textual material in an XML document. Note I said 'textual material' -- this _does_ often contain ampersands, but close-enought-to-never contains the catastrophic ]]>. The same observation does _not_, of course, apply to large amounts of binary data. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@i... URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFI4gbvkjnJixAXWBoRAtTEAJsEysg69tq/waewaZA45kyNWjMk1gCdGm9N zHYh6kWxwcLziqmewAngfKw= =6VbY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format