• From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)
• To: "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...>
• Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:01:03 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I seem to be in the minority, but I think using CDATA-sections is
entirely reasonable when inserting large amounts of textual material
in an XML document.  Note I said 'textual material' -- this _does_
often contain ampersands, but close-enought-to-never contains the
catastrophic ]]>.  The same observation does _not_, of course, apply
to large amounts of binary data.

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@i...
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFI4gbvkjnJixAXWBoRAtTEAJsEysg69tq/waewaZA45kyNWjMk1gCdGm9N
zHYh6kWxwcLziqmewAngfKw=
=6VbY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Tradeoffs of XML encoding by enclosing all content in CDATA blocks
    • From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>

• References:
  • Tradeoffs of XML encoding by enclosing all content in CDATA blocks
    • From: "Karr, David" <david.karr@w...>
  • Re: Tradeoffs of XML encoding by enclosing all contentin CDATA blocks
    • From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w...>
  • Re: Tradeoffs of XML encoding by enclosing all content in CDATA blocks
    • From: "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...>